|
MAIZE (Zea mays L.) is one of the
major cereal crops, it ranks third in production following wheat and rice with an average
of 380 million tons produced annually on 120 million ha by 53 countries. It is the world's
most widely grown crop in almost all tropical areas of the world including tropical
highlands over 3000 m in altitude, to temperate areas as far north as the 65th latitude.
Because of different ecological conditions exist between the temperate areas and the
tropics, the insect vectors and their disease agents also are different under these
different conditions. To date at least five viral and two mollicute plant pathogens
affecting maize are vectored by the homopteran insects (aphids, delphacid planthopper and
leafhoppers) in the hot and humid tropics. They include maize dwarf mosaic potyvirus (A
and B), maize stripe tenuivirus, maize rayado fino marafivirus, maize mosaic
nucleorhabdovirus, corn stunt spiroplasma and maize bushy stunt phytoplasma. This chapter
is to focus on the homopteran vectors and their disease agents
I. Aphid transmitted maize dwarf mosaic potyvirus (MDMV):
Maize dwarf mosaic is one of the most important widely distributed virus diseases of
corn (Zea mays L.) in the temperate regions of the world and is especially a
concern to seed producers. It is found in 37 states of the continental U.S.A. and Hawaii.
This disease caused severe yield losses in the learly 1960's particularly in dent corn
(76). However, the crop losses varied greatly depending on the susceptibility of the corn
genotype, virus strains, plant age and environmental factors. Maize dwarf mosaic virus
(MDMV) was named by Williams and Alexander (76) and is closely related to sugarcane mosaic
virus (SCMV) which has at least 13 strains. In 1966 MacKenzie and associates (47)
desbribed MDMV strains A and B on the basis that strain B does not infect Johnsongrass [Sorghum
halepense (L.) Pers.]. Both MDMV strains A and B were reported from Florida in 1978
and 1979 (74). This disease has not been reported as a serious disease in the Tropics and
Subtropics. This is mainly due to limited distribution of the aphid vectors.
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
Considerable variations of mosaic pattern may be produced by MDMV in corn. During
initial symptom development, ligh and dark green mottles are evident on leaves. As the
disease progresses, the alternating light and dark green mottles increase in intensity to
form mosaics, flecks and rings on leaves (Fig. 1).
 Fig.
1. Zea mays infected with MDMV showing light and dark green mottles on leaves.
Note: all pictures in this chapter link to larger images.
The mosaic pattern usually begins at the leaf base and may be irregular and diffuse.
Mosaics produced by MDMV-A are often limited to the interveinal areas and so form stripes.
Mosaic may also be evident on leaf sheaths and flag leaves of the ears. Plant stunting and
poor ear fill may be associated with the mosaic symptoms.
The host range of MDMV is limited to the grass family. Of 66 grass genera tested from
the U.S.A., 44 contained one or more susceptible species. Nearly 250 grass sepecies
including species of Cynodon, Paspalum, and Pennisetum have been
reported as hosts of MDMV; 243 species are susceptible to both MDMV-A and B, 38 grasses
are susceptible to MDMV-B (64).
2. Properties of MDMV:
MDMV particles are flexuous rods, typical of the potyvirus group measuring about 750 nm
in length and 12-15 nm in diameter (74). Pinwheel inclusion bodies in infected tissue are
often evident. MDMV-A causes `Atlas' sorghum [Sorghum biocolor (L.) Moench]. It
does not infect wheat. In contrast, MDMV-B infects corn, causing local lesions, and may
become systemic on `Atlas' sorghum and other sorghum cultivars. Strain B does not infect
Johnsongrass or wheat but does infect St. Augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum
(Walt.) Kuntze] in south Florida (74) and other species of Stenotaphrum.
3. Transmission MDMV:
Seed transmission of MDMV (up to 0.5%) results in a hgh disease incidence in maturing
plants (9). MDMV is also readily transmissible by aphids in a nonpersistent manner which
means that both virus acquisition and inoculation by aphids can occur in a few seconds. At
least 25 species of aphids have been reported to be vectors (42). The transmission
efficiency varies greatly depending upon aphid species, environmental conditions, virus
strains and host plants. The virus can survive in perennial grasses or in the seed of
annual or perennial grasses which represent important sources for both MDMV and the aphids
that transmit it. Long distance movement of the viruliferous aphids in low level wind jet
streams can also be an important factor in virus spread. The aphid species known to be
efficient vectors of MDMV are: the green bug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), the
corn root aphid, Aphis maidiradicis Forbes, the cowpea aphid, A. craccivora
Koch, the bean aphid, A. fabae Scopoli, the melon aphid, A. gossypii Glover,
the boat gall aphid, Hyalopterus atriplicis (L.), the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon
pisum (Harris), the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), the English
grain aphid, Macrosiphum avenae (F), the blue grass aphid, the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalomyzus
poae (Gillette) and Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (42).
II. Corn delphacid transmitted maize stripe tenuivirus (MStV):
Maize stripe disease was first described in 1936 in E. Africa by Storey who recognized
two types of symptoms, one with narrow yellow stripes on the leaves, the other with broad
stripes (65). Kulkarni (43) demonstrated that two symptoms of maize stripe were associated
with two distinct pathogens and were transmitted persistently by the corn delphacid,
Peregrinus maidis (Ashmead). Later Bock et al. (8) proved that the narrow yellow
stripe was caused by a rhabdovirus. To date maize stripe has been reported from Venezuela,
Florida the Philippines, Mauritius, Australia, Peru and Taiwan (75).
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
Initial symptoms on the inoculated plants are fine chlorotic stipplings between the
veins which later develop into continuous chlorotic stripes of varying width and intensity
(68)(Fig. 2A) , often with a 'brushed out' appearance (40) towards the tips of stripes
(Fig. 2B).
 Fig. 2. Zea mays infected with MStV showing early symptom
of fine chlorotic stipplings (A); and continuous chlorotic stripes with typical
"brushed out" appearance (B).
Young plants at the 4 to 5-leaf stage inoculated with MStV often exhibit complete
chlorosis on the emerging whorl leaf, and the center leaf usually remains folded and bent
(68). The host range of MStV includes Zea spp., and several Sorghum spp. as
well as Rottboellia exaltata. This virus can infect barley, rye, oats, wheat and
triticale under experimental conditions, (17,75).
2. Properties of MStV Nucleoproteins:
MStV is a member of newly recognized tenuivirus group which includes rice stripe virus
(RSV), rice joja blanca virus (RHBV), rice grassy stunt virus (RGSV) and European wheat
striate mosaic virus (EWSMV). This group exhibits several unique properties different from
other characterized RNA plant viruses (31). Thin, filamentous, sometime circular
infectious nucleoprotein particles have been associated with tenuivirus infected plants
(15,75). The nucleoprotein particles are composed of a ca. 35,000 Mr nucleocapsid protein
and 4-5 species of RNA (15,25,67). When analyzed by denaturing gel electrophoresis, the 5
RNAs have molecular weights of 0.52, 0.78, 0.81, 1.18 and 3.01 x 106. The
complete nucleotide sequences of MStV RNA2, RNA3, RNA4
and RNA5 have been determined as 3337 nt, 2357 nt, 2227 nt and 1317 nt in size,
respectively (22,25,29,75). The 16,000 Mr (16K) protein which has been referred to as the
NCP is found abundanttly in MStV-infected plants (28) and it can readily be found in sap
from infected plants as crystals by phase-contrast light microscopy and the crystals react
with antiserum to MStV NCP in immunofluorescence microscopy (12). The NCP is found as
large aggregates forming filamentous electron opaque inclusion bodies (4). Recently study
showed that fibrous intracellar inclusins can be readily found in paradermal sections of
the leaf sheath of MStV infected maize (59). The nucleotide sequence of MStV NCP gene has
also been determined.
Antisera to the 32,000 Mr (32 K) capsid and 16,500 Mr (16 K) NCP have been used for
immunological analyses of extracts from MStV-infected maize plants and from inoculative P.
maidis. The antiserum against the noncapsid protein was found to be very useful for
detecting MStV infections in plants by indirect ELISA (28,75). Other MStV-infected hosts
such as rye (Secale cereale), itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) and oats (Avena
sativa) were detected satisfactorily by indirect ELISA (23,75).
The 32 K protein was easily detected in extracts of both MStV-infected plants and
inoculative P. maidis by ELISA and by immunological analysis of `Western' blots
(28). The 32 K protein was detected only in individual P. maidis that also
transmitted MStV to plants. The 16 K protein was only detected in MStV-infected plant
hosts but not from extracts of groups or of individual MStV inoculative P. maidis (17,75).
There are several other planthopper-borne viruses of gramineae which are related to
MStV. One of these, rice stripe virus (RSV) from Taiwan and Japan, was reported to be
composed of a 9-11 and 3-8 nm nucleoprotein, respectively (17,67). RSV also has been shown
to be serologically related to MStV (17) based on tests using antisera to their capsid
proteins, however, MStV noncapsid protein antiserum did not react with RSV infected rice
(34). Indirect ELISA and one dimensional peptide-mapping analysis on two other
planthopper-borne viruses of gramineae, rice hoja blanca virus (RHBV) and Echinochloa
hoja blanca virus (EHBV) in comparison with MStV showed that the MStV noncapsid and capsid
proteins were different from those corresponding proteins of RHBV and EHBV (28).
3. Transmission Characteristics of MStV:
MStV is transmitted by P. maidis in a persistent-propagative manner. Nymphs of P.
maidis transmitted MStV with ca. twice the efficiency after a 24-, 48-, 68-, 96-,
and 192 hr acquisition access period (AAP) as did adults. Macropterous adults were
slightly more efficient transmitters than brachypterous adults (Fig. 3).
 Fig. 3. Peregrinus maidis; macropterous adult (right) and
brachypterous adult (left).
The minimum AAP of MStV by nymphs was 4 hr. The minimum incubation period (IP) in both
nymphs and adults was 4 to 5 days. The average retention of MStV by 2nd and 3rd instars
was 13.7, 13.2, and 15.8 days after 48, 72, and 98 hr AAP as compared to 3.7, 5.5, and 6.5
days retention by adults. MStV could also be transmitted by sap injection, hemolymph
injection and transovarial passages (69). The rate of transovarial transmission was
reported as high as 33.3% (69) and 59% (32). In a time course study, no 32 K protein was
detected in P. maidis until 8 days after the beginning of a 5-day AAP on
MStV-infected plants. The percentage of MStV-positive P. maidis increased overtime
indicating multiplication of MStV in P. maidis (28). These data suggest that MStV
is propagative in P. maidis
4. Biology of P. maidis:
P. maidis is pantropical species and has been recorded from most tropical
regions (70). In general, there are 5 stadia in the nymphal stage. however, the number of
stadia varied depending on the temperatures. The nymphal development time and adult
longevity were also temperature dependent. Developmental times for each stadium varied
from 10 to 24.3 days for stadia one through four at 10oC, 7.7 to 13.5 days for
stadia one through five at 26.7oC, and 1.9 to 16.8 days for stadia one through
four at 32.2oC. Both male and female longevities were highest at 15.6oC
and lowest at 10oC. Number of eggs laid per day per female was (mean+
SD) 605 + 2.5, number of eggs per female per life was (mean + SD) 605 +
190.1. Preoviposition period was 3 to 6 days, and the oviposition period was 11 to 48
days. The optimal temperatures for P. maidis development are 21.1oC and
26.7oC (70).
It was found that several spot characteristics such as the number of tarsomers on the
metatarsi, the number of pits on each side of pronotum, the number of teeth on the second
tarsomere, and metatibial spurs can be used to identify P. maidis instars (70). P.
maidis was reported to utilize such plant hosts as Sorghum bicolor (L.), Pennisetum
typhoides (Burm.) Stapf and Hubb, Echinochloa colonum (L.) Link,
and Paspalum scrobiculatum L. (56). We have found that this insect was found to
breed on S. bicolor, Rottboellia exaltata, Tripsacum dactyloides (73).
III. Corn delphacid transmitted maize mosaic nucleorhabdovirus
(MMV):
Maize mosaic was first reported in 1914 in Hawaii (44). It is considered a serious
disease in the tropics and subtropics, and has been speculated as a possible cause of the
collapse of Mayan civilization (14). The rhabdovirus morphology of maize mosaic virus
(MMV) was not known for nearly 40 years (41). MMV is also transmitted by P. maidis
in a persistent manner. Maize mosaic has often been confused with maize stripe in the
literature because of their similarity. MMV has been reported in Central and South
America, Mexico, India, Mauritius, Reunion, Madagascar, and Tanzania (41,75). Although the
rhabdovirus infections of maize in the U.S. were found in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana, and
Mississippi, positive vector identification and serological relationship to MMV were only
done with Florida isolate of MMV (75).
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
Initial symptoms of maize mosaic are light-green to yellow long stripes along the
midrib, these stripes elongate to form the distinct, even, chlorotic stripes between and
along the veins extending from the base of the leaf to the tip (Fig. 4).
 Fig. 4. Zea mays infected with MMV showing elongated chlorotic
stripes between the veins. Note that these stripes do not fuse together.
All commercial maize hybrids tested in Venezuela were susceptible to MMV (46), and all
U.S. mainland sweet corn inbreds, hybrids, and cultivars tested in Hawaii were susceptible
to MMV (75). Other plants such as R. exaltata, Septaria vulpiseta Roem. E. Schult, S.
verticilliflorum Z. mays mexicana Iltis and Sorghum sp. Axonopus compressus
Beauv. are susceptible to MMV (6,46,75). Yield losses of more than 50% under glasshouse
and field conditions were recorded (6).
2. Properties of MMV:
Various sizes of MMV virions have been reported. Dimensions of 255 X 90 nm for
negatively-stained partially-purified preparations, and 242 X 48 nm for particles in thin
sections of MMV-infected tissues have been reported for the Venezuelan isolate (46); 224 X
68 nm and 234-325 X 63 nm have been reported for purified virions and those in
MMV-infected cells, respectively, for the Florida isolate (10,24); and deminsions of 204 X
67 nm for bullet-shaped particles, 245 X 80 nm for bacilliform particles have been
reported for the Hawaiian isolate of MMV (53).
Both the perinuclear accumulation of virus particles in the infected cells (10) and the
presence of particle in the cytoplasm of epidermal, mesophyll, and vascular parenchyma
cells and phloem and xylem elements of infected plants have been reported (46,53). The
granular masses were found to surround the nuclei of the peidermal strips of MMV infected
leaves and roots using light microscopy (59).
The virions of MMV have been purified. MMV virions contained a single-stranded RNA of
Mr 4.2 X 106 (24). MMV virons contain three major structural proteins of Mr
75,000, 54,000, and 30,000 as analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The Florida isolate of MMV is
serologically related to Venezuelan MMV (24), and the three isolates of MMV from Mauritius
were also related to Venezuelan MMV (6).
3. Characteristics of MMV Transmission by P. maidis:
MMV is solely transmitted by P. maidis in a persistent-propagative
manner. The rate of MMV transmission by P. maidis by means of plant acquisition
ranged from 5 to 42% (26,46). P. maidis was able to acquire MMV in less than 15
min. The virus persisted in P. maidis and the patterns of transmission were often
erratic (26,75). The median incubation period (IP50) was 13.5 and 14.8 days for
Florida isolate of MMV (26). The efficiency of MMV transmission by P. maidis could
be increased from 20-43% by injection with either purified MMV or with sap from
MMV-infected corn plants (26,46).
The detection of MMV in individuals of P. maidis was dependent on inoculum
concentrations (26). The total number of MMV-postive P. maidis decreased with
decreasing injection inoculum concentrations (25, 2.5 and 0.25 ug/ml). The average
absorbance value for MMV-positive P. maidis increased with time at all three
concentrations, indicating multiplication of MMV in P. maidis.
IV. Corn leafhopper transmitted maize rayado fino marafivirus
(MRFV):
Maize rayado fino was first reported in El Salvador in the 1960's (5). Later Gamez (30)
demonstrated a Costa Rican isolate of maize rayado fino virus (MRFV) transmission by the
corn leafhopper, Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott). This disease has also been
found in Uruguay, Brazil, Colombia, Panama, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico, Peru,
Venezuela, Ecuador and the U.S. (30,57,66,75). Yield losses in Central America may be up
to 40-50% of early infected plants. Losses and incidences may reach 100% for newly
introduced cultivars (30). All maize cultivars tested were susceptible to MRFV in Central,
South and North America (30,66).
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
Symptoms on the inoculated maize first appear 7-14 days after inoculation as a few rows
of fine, unevenly spaced chlorotic dots or short stripes along the secondary and tertiary
veins at the basal portions of the young leaves (Fig. 5).
 Fig. 5. Zea mays infected with MRFV showing fine and unevenly spaced
dots and stipplings at the basal portion of young leaves.
The discolorations range from chlorosis to complete bleaching. The dots become more
numerous and fused longitudinally on succeeding leaves as chlorotic stipple stripes.
Symptoms on young plants are always more pronounced than the old plants. However symptoms
tend to fade gradually in most inoculated plants. Only Zea mays and its teosinte
subspecies, Z. luxurians, Z. diploperennis, Tripsacum australe, Rottboellia exaltata,
and several Z. mays X T. dactyloides hybrids were susceptible to MRFV (57).
2. Properties of MRFV:
MRFV can be readily extracted from infected tissue with simple procedures (30). The
Texas and Florida isolates of MRFV have been purified by means of chloroform
clarification, rate-zonal centrifugation, and isopyncnic banding in CsCl (27,33). MRFV
particles are isometric, 22-33 nm in diameter and contain a single-stranded RNA genome
(2.4 X 106 daltons) (33). The irregular inclusions and granular inclusions in
the parenchyma and phloem cells of leaf sheaths, lef veins and roots were used for
diagnosis of MRFV infection (59).
3. Characteristics of MRFV Transmission by D. maidis:
MRFV is transmitted by D. maidis in a persistent manner. A protracted incubation
period in the vector is required. The rate of MRFV transmission by D. maidis was
usually low ranging from 10-34% (30,57). Nymphs were more efficient transmitters than the
adults (57). The average IP in D. maidis varied from 12.5 to 16 days. The average
retention period in D. maidis ranged from 16.5-20.2. The infectivity of partially
purified MRFV was demonstrated by vector injection and membrane feeding (30). Gonzales and
Gamez (35) were first to suggest that MRFV multiplies in D. maidis. Later Nault et
al. (57) demonstrated that the transmission rate for D. maidis injected with
partially purified MRFV was dosage dependent. Using ELISA tests, MRFV was shown to
multiply in D. maidis in a time course study (33,63). The Texas isolate of MRFV has
also been experimentally transmitted by D. elimatus, Stirellus bicolor, and Graminella
nigrifrons (57). MRFV was reported to be pathogenic to D. maidis and D.
elimatus (7).
V. Leafhopper transmitted corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS):
Corn stunt is one of the most economically important diseases of maize in the U.S.,
Mexico, and Central and South America (55). For many years corn stunt was thought to be
caused by several strains of a virus based on symptomatology and vector transmission
(37,55). The helical morphology of the causal agent of Rio Grande corn stunt (51) was
subsequently established (16,19,77) and was named as corn stunt spiroplasma (CSS) (Spiroplasma
kunkelii), CSS is transmitted naturally by D. maidis (DeLong and Wolcott), and D.
elimatus (Ball), and experimentally by Graminella nigrifrons (Forbes), G.
sonora (Ball), Stirellus bicolor (Van Duzee), Exitianus exitiosus
(Uhler), and Euscelidius variegatus (Kirsch.) (37,55,56).
During 1978-1980, the CSS played a dominant role in the epidemic in south Florida as
part of the disease complex (11,72); the infection of CSS in the diseased field samples in
1979 and 1980 reached 68.4 and 98.5%, respectively (11).
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
The initial symptoms of Rio Grande corn stunt showed characteristic small chlorotic
stripes that developed at the leaf bases of new leaves after about 25-30 days. The
chlorotic stripes become fused and extended further toward the leaf tips in the older
leaves with green spots and stripes on a chlorotic background (Fig. 6). The infected
plants had much shorter internodes and a proliferation of secondary shoots in leaf axils.
 Fig. 6. Zea mays infected with CSS showing fused chlorotic stripes
and shortened internodes.
The reddening on leaves varied depending on the corn genotype and environmental
conditions. The plant hosts of CSS are Z. mays, Z. mays mexicana (Schrad.) Iltis, Z.
diploperenis Iltis, Doebley and Guzman, Z. perennis (Hitchc.) Reeves and
Mangelsd, Z. mays X Tripsacum floridanum Porter ex Vasey L., and Z.
luxurians (Durieu and Ascherson) Bird (54,55). In addition, Vicia faba L., Catheranthus
roseus (L.) G. Don, and Lolium perenne L. were reported to be susceptible to
CSS. Radish (Raphanus sativus), mustard (Sinapis alba) and spinach (Spinacia
oleracea) were also reported as experimental hosts for CSS (52).
2. Properties of CSS:
CSS is a motile, helical, cell wall-free prokaryote as seen by phase contrast or dark
field microscopy of plant juice or hemolymph and abdominal smears from leafhopper vectors
(19). It is a phloem limited organism (Fig. 7).
 Fig. 7. Spiroplasma kunkelii showing its helical and
membrane bound morphology in a phloem cell of the infected Z. mays.
CSS is highly resistant to penicillin, but sensitive to antibodies in vitro tests, and
treatment of inoculated plants with tetracycline antibiotic caused remission of symptoms
and interfered with leafhopper transmission (37). CSS was first isolated in an artificial
medium, and subsequently was cultured and subcultured (16,20). The successful culture and
subculture depended on the method of isolation, incubation temperature, atmospheric
conditions, pH, osmotic pressure of the culture medium and composition of medium (75).
CSS was reported to be pathogenic to D. elimatus and D. maidis (39). The
pathogenicity of CSS to D. maidis, D. elimatus, D. gelbus, D. guevarai, D.
quinquenotatus, D. tripsacoides and Baldulus tripsaci by shortening the longevity of
leafhoppers has been demonstrated (48,49,58). Other effects of CSS on leafhopper survival
and fecundity (48,49,58), development rates (48) have also been studied.
CSS is not only related to Spiroplasma citri which is the causal agent of citrus
stubborn disease, but also to spiroplasmas from honey bees, flower nectar, and ticks. Like
other spiroplasmas, it can be infected by spiroplasma virus (20).
3. Characteristics of Leafhopper Transmission:
CSS is transmitted by D. maidis in a persistent and propagative manner
(1,56,72). Other vectors include D. elimatus D. grievarai (DeLong), G.
nigrifrons, G. sonora, S. bicolor, E. exitosus, Cicadulina mbila (Naude), Macrosteles
sexnotatus (Fallen) E. variegatus (52,54,56). D. maidis is the
most efficient vector of CSS (2,52) with an AAP of 15 min and 7 days, 15 and 100% of the
test insect transmitted CSS respectively, (52). CSS transmission could also be achieved by
injection of the vector with either sap extracted from the infected plant or cultured CSS
and membrane feeding (16,20,52). 100% transmission efficiency of D. maidis
following injection and membrane feeding has been reported (1,2). The IP50 in D.
maidis was 19 and 21.2 days (54,55) 17.5 to 21.2 days (72), and 14.3 days (1,2). The
length of IP was negatively related to the length of AAP (1,2). The retention periods of
CSS by D. maidis were variable ranging from 42 days (1,2), to 45 days (72).
D. guevarai was reported to be a more efficient vector of a Mexican isolate of
CSS than D. maidis (62). The rates of CSS transmission by D. elimantus, E.
exitiosus, G. nigrifrons, and S. bicolor after a 4-day AAP were at 80, 84, 20,
and 61%, respectively (54). The transmission rate of a Jamaican isolate of CSS by C.
mbila, E. variegatus and M. sexnotatus were at 60, 3.8 and 2%, respectively
(52).
4. Biology of D. maidis:
Davis (33) performed a study on the biology of D. maidis at six temperatures and
found that D. maidis adult longevity at 70oF was 26-51 days and the
average number of eggs produced per female per life was 151, and females failed to lay
eggs at 55o and 65oF. Tsai (71) studied the life history of D.
maidis at 10, 15.6, 26.7, and 32.2oC. The average development times for
instars I-V ranged from 11.6 to 33.6 days at 10oC, 6.3 to 13.3 days at 15.6oC,
2.5 to 3.8 days at 26.7oC, and 2.4 to 4.4 days at 32.2oC. Both male
and female (Fig. 8) longevities were greatest at 15.6oC and lowest at 32.2oC.
 Fig. 8.
Adult Dalbulus maidis; female (left) and male (right).
Oviposition data obtained at 15.6 and 26.7oC, respectively, showed that the
number (x + SD) of eggs per female per day was 3.62 + 1.09 at 15.6oC
and 14.18 + 3.55 at 26.7oC, the number (x + SD) of eggs per
female per life was 402.33 + 140.03 at 15.6oC and 611.08 + 164.96
at 26.7oC. Eggs were seldom laid within 24 hours after adult emergence. Adult
longevities (x + SD) between mated females and unmated females at 15.6 and 26.7oC
were 111.00 + 14.54 days for mated, and 180.00 + 26.09 days for unmated at
15.6oC, and 45.15 + 15.81 days for mated and 112.00 + 16.52 days
for unmated at 26.7oC. Pitre (60) reported that the nymphal development time on
corn ranged from 11 to 16 days and the average adult longevity was 12.2 and 12.1 days for
females and males, respectively. Besides corn, teosinte, Euchlaena mexicana and
gamma grass, Tripsacum dactyloides were also reported as alternate hosts of D.
maidis (61). The mean nymphal development time on T. dactyloides was 15.4 and
15.3 days and the average adult longevity was 33 and 11.6 days for females and males,
respectively (60). Tsai (71) also tested T. dactyloides, T. dactyloides var.
meridonale, T. floridanum, Rottboellia exaltata, Secale cereale, and
Avena sativa as alternate hosts for D. maidis and found that only T.
dactyloides var. meridonale was suitable for rearing D. maidis.
VI. Leafhopper transmitted maize bushy stunt phytoplasma (MBSM):
In 1955, Maramorosch described two types of corn stunt from Mexico. The first type was
designated as Rio Grande corn stunt originally described Kunkel (45) from Texas. The
second type was designated as Mesa Central corn stunt which is now believed to be a
nonhelical mycoplasma, the maize bushy stunt mycoplasma (MBSM) (54). Maramorosch (51)
futher demonstrated the difference of these two agents by means of cross protection
between maize bushy mycoplasma and CSS. Based on symptomatology, the Louisiana and
Mississippi corn stunt agents could also be MBSM (36,38,75). However the proof of their
identity and relationship awaits culture of the MBSM and serological study.
1. Symptomatology and Host Range:
Inoculated plants initially develop a marginal yellow and orange color of the older
leaves. The symptoms on subsequently developed leaves are characterized by marginal
chlorosis, tearing, shortening and twisting of young leaf tips. Numerous tillers develop
at the base of the plant and at leaf axils. Sweet corn cultivars such as
"Aristogold" and "Aritogold Bantam Evergreen" hybrids develop
extensive leaf reddening, and more basal and auxillary shoots as compared to
"Guardian" sweet corn (Fig. 9).
 Fig. 9. Zea mays infected with MBSM showing extensive leaf reddening
(left) and stunting and auxiliary shoots (right).
Only maize and three races of Z. mays L. mexicana (Schrod.) Iltis are known to
be susceptible to MBSM (54).
2. Biology of MBSM:
MBSM is a phloem limited phytoplasma and is similar in morphology and ultrastructure to
that of yellows diseases of plants (Fig. 10).
 Fig.
10. Maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in a phloem cell of the infected Z. mays showing
pleomorphic and membrane bound morphology.
Granados (36) demonstrated the occurrence of Louisiana corn stunt agent both in vectors
and plants. MBSM has not been cultured in vitro. Recently, cloned DNA probes for detecting
MBSM from the experimentally inoculated corn and infectious D. maidis were developed (22).
3. Transmission Characteristics of MBSM by Leafhopper Vectors:
MBSM is transmitted by D. maidis in a peristent and propagative manner. It is
also transmitted by D. elimatus, Baldulus tripsaci, G. nigrifrons,
and G. sonorus (36,38,54,55). The rate of MBSM transmission by D. maidis
ranged from 43.9 to 88.9% (54,72) whereas it was transmitted by D. elimatus and G.
nigrifrons at 58.8 and 8.2%, respectively (54). The mean IP for Texas isolate of MBSM
in D. maidis was 24.2 and 25.5 days (54,72) and IP50 for Florida islate
of MBSM in D. maidis was 28 days (72). The minimum IP for the Louisiana isolate of
corn stunt was 17 to 22 days for D. maidis, 14 to 15 days for D. elimatus
and 22 to 26 days for G. nigrifrons (38). The minimum IP for Mississippi isolate
was 12 days for D. maidis and 15 to 18 days for G. nigrifrons. The average
retention time for Texas and Florida isolates of MBSM was 32.6 and 34.5 days, respectively
(72). Under field conditions, plants were often found to be doubly- infected with CSS and
MBSM (55,75). However, the symptoms of MBSM in the doubly- infected plants always
developed earlier than those of CSS as the incubation period for MBSM in corn was 18.9
days compared to 43.3 days for CSS (55).
The Prospect of control:
Disease and/or pest control is the ultimate goal of each researcher. The complexity of
insect-transmitted corn pathogens makes them more difficult to control. The most widely
employed practice at present time is integrated pest management (3). However, the most
promising control measure is the use of resistant or tolerant varieties. To date the only
successful example in developing the major breeding program for both dent and sweet corn
resistant to MMV is done by Brewbaker (13). No corn lines immune to MStV, MRFV, CSS, MBSM
are available. This poses a tremendous challenge for maize genetisists and breeders to
identify the gene(s) responsible for the resistance in maize germplasm. Any fruitful
results will probably have to come from the concerted effort of molecular biologists,
plant breeders, plant pathologists and vector entomologists.
We are all aware of the recent advances in biotechnology. Its promise is so powerful
that it cuts across disciplines of biological sciences and offers us a promising tool to
address the complex problems of maize. By using the techniques of protoplast fusion, in
vitro plant culture and recombinant DNA technology, one should be able to hybridize
corn with the perennial relatives of maize among Zea and Tripsacum spp.
which are tolerant or immune to CSS and MBSM, or perhaps with other sexually incompatible
monocotyledon species as well as to develop better control of the pests. Biotechnology
potentially cuts down the time required for corn variety breeding and propagation, and it
provides maize researchers with a good method for protecting and exchanging germplasm.
References Cited
1. Alivizatos, A. S., and Markham, P. G. 1986. Multiplication of corn stunt spiroplasma
in Dalbulus maidis and transmission in vitro, following
injection. Ann. Appl. Biol. 108:545-554.
2. Alivizatos, A. S., and Markham, P. G. 1986. Acquisition and transmission of corn
stunt spiroplasma by its leafhopper vector Dalbulus maidis. Ann. Appl. Biol.
108:535-544.
3. All, J. N. 1983. Integrating techniques of vector and weed-host suppression into
control programs for maize virus diseases. pp. 243-247 In: Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus
Dis. Colloq. and Workshop, 2-6 August 1982. D.T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, L. R. Nault, and R.
M. Ritter, (eds.). The Ohio State Univ., Ohio Research and Development Center, Wooster.
266 pp.
4. Ammar, E. D., Gingery, R. E., and Nault, L. R. 1985. Two types of inclusions in
maize infected with maize stripe virus. Phytopathology 75:84-89.
5. Ancalmo, O., and Davis, W. C. 1961. Achaparramiento (corn stunt). Plant Dis. Rep.
45:281.
6. Autrey, L. J. C. 1983. Maize mosaic virus and other maize virus diseases in the islands
of the Western Indian Ocean. pp. 167-181 In: Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus Dis. Colloq.
and Workshop. 2-6 August 1982. D. T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, L. R. Nault, and R. M. Ritter
(eds.). The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center,
Wooster. 266 pp.
7. Bacardo, L. E., Graziano, J. V., Montessaro, R. R., and Majica, H. B. 1984. Tablas
de vida y fertilidad de poblaciones de Dalbulus maidis DeLong & Wolcott y Dalbulus
elimatus Ball (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) transmisoras y no transmisoras del virus del
rayado fino del maiz. Agrociencia 57: 195-205.
8.Bock, K. R., Guthrie, E. J., and Woods, R. D. 1974. Purification of maize streak
virus and its relation-ship to viruses associated with streak diseases of sugarcane and Panicum
maximum. Ann. Appl. Biol. 77:289-296.
9. Boothroyd, C. W. 1977. Seed transmission of maize dwarf mosaic virus in sweet corn
and yield reduction in plants from an infected seed lot (Abstract) Proc. Am. Phytopathol.
Soc. 4:184.
10. Bradfute, O. E., and Tsai, J. H. 1983. Identification of maize mosaic virus in
Florida. Plant Dis. 67:1339-1342.
11. Bradfute, O. E., Tsai, J. H., and Gordon, D. T. 1981. Corn stunt spirolplasma and
viruses associated with a maize disease epidemic in southern Florida. Plant Dis.
65:837-841.
12. Bradfute, O. E., and Tsai, J. H. 1990. Rapid identification of maize stripe virus.
Phytopathology 80:715-719.
13. Brewbaker, J. L. 1975. Resistance to maize mosaic virus I in Hawaii. pp. 4-5 In:
Corn and Sorghum Diseases and Insect Pests in Hawaii. Hawaii Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Publ.
122, Univ. Hawaii. 22 pp.
14. Brewbaker, J. L. 1980. Diseases of maize in the wet lowland tropics and the
collapse of the Maya civilization. Econ. Bot. 33:101-118.
15. Chen, C. C., Tsai, J. H., Chiu, R. J., and Chen, M. J. 1993. Purification,
characterizaiton, and serological analysis of maize stripe virus in Taiwan. Plant Dis.
77:367-372.
16. Chen, T. A., and Liao, C. H. 1975. Corn stunt spiroplasma: isolation, cultivation, and
proof of pathogenicity. Science 188:1015-1017.
17. Chen, C. C., Chao, C. H. Chen, Y. K. and Tsai, J. H. 1996. Comparative studies on
the partial properties of three tenuiviruses occurring in Taiwan. Taichung District Agric.
Improv. Sta. Research Bull. 50:29-43.
18. Davis, R. 1966. Biology of the leafhopper Dalbulus maidis at selected
temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 59:766.
19. Davis, R. E., and Worley, J. F. 1973. Spiroplasma: Motile, helical microorganism
associated with corn stunt disease. Phytopathology 63:403-408.
20. Davis, R. E., Chen, T. A., and Worley, J. F. 1981. Corn stunt spiroplasma. pp.
40-50 In: Virus and Viruslike Diseases of Maize in the United States. D. T. Gordon,
J. K. Knoke, and G. E. Scott (eds.). South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 247. 218 pp.
21. Davis, M. J., Tsai, J. H., Cox, R. L., McDaniel, L. L., and Harrison, N.A. 1988.
Cloning of chromosomal and extrachromosomal DNA of the mycoplasmalike organism that causes
maize bushy stunt disease. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 1:295-302.
22. Estabrook, E. M., Suyenaga, K., Tsai, J. H. and Falk, B. W. 1996. Maize stripe
tenuivirus RNA2 is ambisense and encodes a protein similar to the Phlebovirus
virion membrane glycoproteins. Virus Gene (In press).
23. Falk, B. W., and Tsai, J. H. 1983. Assay for maize stripe virus-infected plants by
antiserum produced to a purified noncapsid protein. Phytopathology 73:1259-1262.
24. Falk, B. W., and Tsai, J. H. 1983. Physicochemical characterization of maize mosaic
virus. Phytopathology 73:1536-1539.
25. Falk, B. W., and Tsai, J. H. 1984. Identification of single- and double-stranded
RNAs associated with maize stripe virus. Phytopathology 74:909-915.
26. Falk, B. W., and Tsai, J. H. 1985. Serological detection and evidence for
multiplication of maize mosaic virus in the planthopper, Peregrinus maidis.
Phytopathology 75:852-855.
27. Falk, B. W., and Tsai, J. H. 1986. The two capsid proteins of maize rayado fino
virus contain common peptide sequences. Intervirology 25:111-116.
28. Falk, B. W., Tsai, J. H., and Lommell, S. A. 1987. Differences in levels of
detection for maize stripe virus capsid and major noncapsid proteins in plant and insect
hosts. J. Gen. Virol. 68:1801-1811.
29. Huiet, L., Tsai, J. H. and Falk, B. W. 1993. Maize stripe virus RNA5 is
of negative polarity and encodes a highly basic protein. J. Gen. Virol. 74:549-554.
30. Gamez, R. 1983. Maize rayado fino disease: The virus-host-vector interaction in
neotropical environments. pp. 62-68. In: Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus Dis. Colloq. and
Workshop, 2-6 August 1982. D. T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, L. R. Nault, and R. M. Ritter
(eds.). The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center,
Wooster. 266 pp.
31. Gingery, R. 1988. The rice stripe virus group. pp. 297-329. In: The Plant Viruses
4: The Filamentous Plant Viruses. R. G. Milne (ed.). Plenum, New York.
32. Gingery, R. E., Nault, L. R., and Bradfute, O. E. 1981. Maize stripe virus:
Characteristics of a member of a new virus class. Virology 112:99-108.
33. Gingery, R. E., Gordon, D. T., and Nault, L. R. 1982. Purification and properties
of an isolate of maize rayado fino virus from the United States. Phytopathology
72:1313-1318.
34. Gingery, R. E., Nault, L. R., and Yamashita, S. 1983. Relationship between maize
stripe virus and rice stripe virus. J. Gen. Virol. 64:1765-1770.
35. Gonzalez, V., and Gamez, R. 1974. Algunos factores que afectan la transmision del
virus del rayado fino del maiz por Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott). Turrialba
24:51-57.
36. Granados, R. R. 1969. Maize viruses and vectors. pp. 327-359 In: Viruses,
Vectors, and Vegetation. K. Maramorosch, (ed.). Interscience Publishers, New York, NY. 666
pp.
37. Granados, R. R. 1969. Chemotherapy of the corn stunt disease (Abstr.)
Phytopathology 59:1556.
38. Granados, R. R., Granados, J. S., Maramorosch, K., and Reinitz, J. 1968. Corn stunt
virus: Transmission by three cicadellid vectors. J. Econ. Entomol. 61:1282-1287.
39. Granados, R. R., and Meehan, D. J. 1975. Pathogenicity of the corn stunt agent to
an insect vector, Dalbulus maidis. J. Invetebr. Pathol. 26:313-320.
40. Greber, R. S. 1983. Characteristics of viruses affecting maize in Australia. pp.
206-218. In: Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus Dis. Colloq. and Workshop. 2-6 August 1982.
D. T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, L. R. Nault, and R. M. Ritter (eds.). The Ohio State
University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster. 266 pp.
41. Herold, F. 1972. Maize mosaic virus. No. 94 In: Descriptions of Plant
Viruses. Commonw. Mycol. Inst., Assoc. Appl. Biologists, Kew, Surrey, England. 4 pp.
42. Knoke, J. K., Anderson, R. J., Louie, R., Modelen, L. V., and Findley, W. R. 1983.
Insect vectors of maize dwarf mosaic virus and maize chlorotic dwarf virus. pp. 130-138. In:
Gordon, D. T., Knoke, J. K., Nault, L. R., and Ritter, R. M. eds. Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus
Disease Calloq. and Workshop. 1982. Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Center, Wooster.
43. Kulkarni, H. Y. 1973. Comparison and characterization of maize stripe and maize
line viruses. Ann. Appl. Biol. 75:205-216.
44. Kunkel, L. O. 1921. A possible causative agent for the mosaic disease of corn.
Hawaii. Sugar Plant. Assoc. Exp. Stn. Bull. Bot. Ser. 3:44-58.
45. Kunkel, L. O. 1948. Studies on a new corn virus disease. Arch. Gesamte Virusforsch.
4:24-46.
46. Lastra, R. J. 1977. Maize mosaic and other maize virus and virus-like diseases in
Venezuela. pp. 30-39 In: Proc. Int'l. Maize Virus Dis. Colloq. and Workshop, 16-19
Aug., 1976. L. E. Williams, D. T. Gordon, and L. R. Nault, (eds.). Ohio Agric. Res. Dev.
Cent., Wooster. 145 pp.
47. MacKenzie, D. R. Wernham, C. C. and Ford, R. E. 1966. Differences in maize dwarf
mosaic virus isolates of the northeatern United States. Plant Dis. Rep. 50:814-818.
48. Madden, L. V., and Nault, L. R. 1983. Differential pathogenicity of corn stunting
mollicutes to leafhopper vectors in Dalbulus and Baldulus species.
Phytopathology 73:1608-1614.
49. Madden, L. V., Nault, L. R., Heady, S. E., and Styer, W. E. 1985. Effect of maize
stunting mollicutes on survival and fecundity of Dalbulus leafhopper vectors. Ann.
Appl. Biol. 105:431-441.
50. Maramorosch, K. 1955. The occurrence of two distinct types of corn stunt in Mexico.
Plant Dis. Rep. 39:896-898.
51. Maramorosch, K. 1958. Cross protection between two strains of corn stunt virus in
an insect vector. Virology 6:448-459.
52. Markham, P. G., and Alivizatos, A. S. 1983. The transmission of corn stunt
spiroplasma by natural and experimental vectors. pp. 56-61 In: Proc. Int'l. Maize
Virus Dis. Colloq. and Workshop. 2-6 August 1982. D. T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, L. R. Nault,
and R. M. Ritter (eds.). The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Res. and Dev. Cent.,
Wooster. 266 pp.
53.McDaniel, L. L., Ammar, E.-D., and Gordon, D. T. 1985. Assembly, morphology, and
accumulation of a Hawaiian isolate of maize mosaic virus in maize. Phytopathology
75:1167-1172.
54.Nault, L. R. 1980. Maize bushy stunt and corn stunt: A comparison of disease
symptoms, pathogen host ranges, and vectors. Phytopathology 70:659-662.
55.Nault, L. R., and Bradfute, O. E. 1979. Corn stunt: Involvement of a complex of
leafhopper-borne pathogens. pp. 561-586 In: Leafhopper Vectors and Plant Disease
Agents. K. Maramorosch and K. F. Harris (eds.). Academic Press, New York, NY. 654 pp.
56.Nault, L. R., and Knoke, J. K. 1981. Maize vectors. pp. 77-84 In: Virus and
Viruslike Diseases of Maize in the United States. D. T. Gordon, J. K. Knoke, and G. E.
Scott, (eds.). Southern Cooperative Series Bull. 247. June 1981. 218 pp.
57.Nault, L. R., Gingery, R. E., and Gordon, D. T. 1980. Leafhopper transmission and
host range of maize rayado fino virus. Phytopathology 70:709-712.
58.Nault,, L. R., Madden, L. V., Styer, W. E., Triplehorn, B. W., Shambaugh, G. F., and
Heady, S. E. 1984. Pathogenicity of corn stunt spiroplasma and maize bushy stunt
mycoplasma to its vector Dalbulus longulus. Phytopathology 74:977-979.
59. Overman, M. A., Ko, N. J., and Tsai, J. H. 1992. Identification of viruses and
mycoplasmas in maize by light microscopy. Plant Dis. 76:318-322.
60.Pitre, H. N. 1970. Observations on the life cycle of Dalbulus maidis on three
plant species. Fla. Entomol. 53:33-37.
61.Pitre, H. N., Combs, R. L., and Douglas, W. A. 1966. Gamagrass, Tripsacum
dactyloides: A new host of Dalbulus maidis, vector of corn stunt
virus. Plant Dis. Rep. 50:570-571.
62.Ramirez, J. L., DeLeon, C., Garcia, C., and Granados, G. 1975. Dalbulus guevarai
(DeL.) nuevo vector del achaparramiento del maiz en Mexico: Incidencia de la enfermedad y
su relacion ocn el vector Dalbulus maidis (DeL. & W.) en Muna. Yucatan.
Agrociencia 22:39-49.
63.Rivera, C., and Gamez, R. 1986. Mustiplication of maize rayado fino virus in the
leafhopper vector Dalbulus maidis. Intervirology 25: 76-83.
64. Rosenkranz, E. 1981. Host range of maize dwarf mosaic virus. pp. 152-162. In:
Gordon, D. T., Knoke, J. K. and Scott, G. E. eds. Virus and viruslike diseases of maize in
the United States. Southern Coop. Series Bulletin 247. June 1981. 218 pp.
65.Storey, H. H. 1936. Virus diseases of East African plants. IV. A Survey of the
viruses attacking the Gramineae. East Afr. Agric. J. 1:333-337.
66.Toler, R. W., Skinner, G., Bockholt, A. J., and Harris, K. F. 1985. Reactions of
maize (Zea mays) accessions to maize rayado fino virus. Plant Dis. 68:56-57.
67.Toriyama, S. 1982. Characterization of rice stripe virus: A heavy component carrying
infectivity. J. Gen. Virol. 61: 187-195.
68.Tsai, J. H. 1975. Occurrence of a corn disease in Florida transmitted by Peregrinus
maidis. Plant Dis. Rep. 59:830-833.
69.Tsai, J. H., and Zitter, T. A. 1982. Transmission characteristics of maize stripe
virus by the corn Delphacid. J. Econ. Entomol. 75:397-411.
70.Tsai, J. H., and Wilson, S. W. 1986. Biology of Peregrinus maidis with
descriptions of immature stages (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.
79:395-401.
71.Tsai, J. H. 1987. Bionomics of Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott). A vector
of mollicutes and virus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). In: Mycoplasma Diseases of
Crops: Basic and Applied Aspects. K. Maramorosch and S. P. Raychaudhuri (eds.). Springer
Verlag. New York, NY.
72.Tsai, J. H. 1987. Mycoplasma diseases of corn in Florida. In: Mycoplasma
Diseases of Crops: Basic and Applied Aspects. K. Maramorosch and S. P. Raychaudhuri
(eds.). Springer Verlag. New York, NY.
73. Tsai, J. H. 1996. Development and oviposition of Peregrinus maidis (Homoptera:
Delphacidae) on various host plants. Fla. Entomol. 70:19-26.
74. Tsai, J. H. and Brown, L. G. 1989. Maize dwarf mosaic virus. Division of Plant
Industry. Fla. Dept. Agric. & Consumer Serv. Plant Path. Circular. No. 320.
75. Tsai, J. H. and Falk, B. W. 1993. Viruses and mycoplasmal agents affecting maize in
the Tropics. pp. 43-48. In: Proc. Symposium on Plant Virus and Virus-like Diseases.
R. J. Chiu and Y. Yeh (eds.) 434. pp.
76. Williams, L. E. and Alexander, L. J. 1965. Maize dwarf mosaic, a new corn disease.
Phytopathology 55:802-804.
77. Williamson, D. L., and Whitcomb, R. F. 1975. Plant mycoplasma: A cultivable
spiroplasma causes corn stunt disease. Science 188:1018-1020.
Return to Radcliffe's IPM World Textbook
Home Page.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified: Wednesday, 16 October, 1996
© Regents of the University of Minnesota, 1999
|
